• This is a work in progress, more to come later today. *

I’ve about had it with WHO’s pandering to CCP interests. I’ll keep this as concise and to the point as possible. Let’s tear some of this trash apart and you’ll get the ACTUAL working links to rebuttals unlike certain worthless publications that are in CCP’s back pocket. Cough.

Keep in mind, this was the goal. “On July 2020,WHO and China began the groundwork for studies to better understand the origins of the virus. Terms of Reference(TORs) were agreed that defined a phased approach, and the scope of studies, the main guiding principles and expected deliverables. The TORs envisaged an initial Phase 1 of short-term studies to better understand how the virus might have been introduced and started to circulate in Wuhan, China. WHO selected an international multidisciplinary team of experts to work closely with a multidisciplinary team of Chinese experts in the design, support and conduct of these studies and to conduct a follow-up visit to review progress and agree upon a series of further studies”

Excellent work, chaps. *slowclap*

And the ever so telling annexes…

Let’s focus in on the annexes, since I guess no one was supposed to actually read these things, eh ?

Page 132. “The rumour about missing data was discussed. This related to an Excel spreadsheet that had been on the website for 10 years as part of a national databank of samples. It had been used for internal analyses and metadata. It had been planned to make this an interactive system with visualized data to fit in with the national system. They received attacks from hackers – more than 3000 cyber-attacks, so was kept offline”

Bullshit.

In reality, what’s being referenced is a 61.5MB MySQL Database [https://archive.is/jPPkB] that was released not even two years back, NOT some worthless Excell sheet. The database is only one of a bunch of WIV db’s that were taken offline for reasons unknown [GEE. I WONDER. WHAT THOSE REASONS. COULD BE. ][https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349073738_An_investigation_into_the_WIV_databases_that_were_taken_offline]

Page 132. “They received attacks from hackers – more than 3000 cyber-attacks, so
was kept offline”

Bullshit.

Zheng-Li Shi can be seen here stating that the database was attacked DURING the pandemic and eventually brought down for that reason. [https://twitter.com/tommy_cleary/status/1369689088790425602]
In reality, the database was actually taken offline on September 12th, 2019 prior to any knowledge of covid hitting mainstream outlets. [https://archive.is/AGtFv]

Page 131. “Miners had been to the cave 2-3 times” in regards tot he Mojiang mine deaths in 2012.

Bullshit.

In reality, the miners developed symptoms after working 7 hours [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d6GdDYtVrstULLSZmmqcu3NlLsYol2OA/view] per day for a duration of 8-14 days [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.581569/full] in that mine.

Page 131. “The reported illnesses associated with the miners, according to the WIV experts, were more likely explained by fungal infections acquired when removing a thick layer of guano. The WHO team suggested”

Bullshit.

This is in direct conflict with the diagnosis of Zhong Nashan, the top SARS expert in china when all this shit went down, who stated that it’s very likely a primary SARS-like coronavirus infection, with possible SECONDARY fungal infections in some cases. [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d6GdDYtVrstULLSZmmqcu3NlLsYol2OA/view] Moreover, the “WIV EXPERT” diagnosis contradicts the positive bat SARS antibody tests (IgG and IgM) which were obtained from 4 of the 6 miners. [these four tests were carried out at the WIV and also gone over in depth in this phd thesis [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OdWCjEJEqEyxbujWwvkf0hknxDoRTCAw/view]]

Page 130. Shi Zhengli says “all fieldwork is done with full PPE”.

Bullshit.

There is plenty of videos, photos and statements showing limited PPE use at best by WIV personnel during field work. This was also LITERALLY CONFIRMED by Shi Zhengli in her own dumbass presentation https://v.qq.com/x/cover/7qm4vff0bszr5m0/y0729mjka6a.html?start=37 [relevant part starts at 16:30] and transcript is available here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LxEyGiDjG6dTSM3uTi4MVIut-rgkdEVIZjFFaJpKdIg/edit
“Although bats carry many viruses, the chance of directly infecting humans is very small. Higher-level protection measures will be taken when we know that bats in a certain location carry viruses that may be transmitted to humans, and in most cases only ordinary protection will be taken.”

Page 132. “The only SARS-CoV-2-like virus found by this group is RaTG13, which is
neither a live (cultured) virus nor the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2″

Bullshit.

There’s quite literally 8 other fucking SARS-CoV-2 most related viruses (the 7896 clade) and can be
seen in THE GOD DAMN SLIDES shown by Shi Zheng Li in WEBINARS. FFS. RIGHT. HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSISkvlesnA&t=4808s

Page 131. “However, none of them [mine viruses] has higher similarity to SARS-CoV-2 than the RaTG13 has.”

Bullshit.

You LITERALLY CAN NOT FUCKING SAY THAT when the 7896 clade [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSISkvlesnA&t=4736s] viruses are also very similar to SARS-CoV-2 based on their RdRp, but STILL haven’t been fully published more than a god damn year after the start of the pandemic (only the short RdRp sections have been published). MORETHEFUCKOVER, on other occasions the existence of a 100 or so related viruses (28:20) has been LITERALLY mentioned [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYDL_RK–w&t=1695s].

Page 132. “The rumours of a leak from the laboratory were refuted categorically by the laboratory director for the
following reasons:”

Bullshit.

Yuan Zhiming [director of WIV p4 lab] refutes every single possibility of a lab leak. Categorically. However, he repeatedly denounced structural issues with many labs in china before the pandemic. Literally as freaking recent as October 2019. His quotes:

○“Due to different investment sources, affiliations, and management systems, the
implementation of these laboratories faces difficulties converging objectives and
cooperation workflows. This scenario puts laboratory biosafety at risk since the
implementation efficiency and timely operations are relatively compromised.”
○ “several high-level BSLs have insufficient operational funds for routine yet vital
processes. Due to the limited resources, some BSL-3 laboratories run on
extremely minimal operational costs or in some cases none at all.”
○ “Currently, most laboratories lack specialized biosafety managers and engineers.
In such facilities, some of the skilled staff is composed by part-time researchers.
This makes it difficult to identify and mitigate potential safety hazards in facility
and equipment operation early enough.”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933819300391?via%3Dihub

Misc. bullshit: None of the annexes specify the number of people tested for antibodies (IgG) within the Wuhan institute of Virology and other labs in Wuhan working on BatCoV. From the results (all negative) we can only infer that a small fraction of the 590 WIV staff and students were actually tested. With the reported prevailing background antibodies (IgG) positive rate of around 4% in urban Wuhan around April, the probability of no positive antibodies test (IgG+) amongst any reasonable number of potentially directly exposed staff and students becomes quickly extremely fucking small, and is effectively null for the full population of 590. A proper review of tests SHOULD instead take into account ALL the god damn staff (including maintenance staff), all students and all construction and temporary workers on site at the WIV, WIBP and at the other Wuhan P3 labs of interest, plus all sample collection staff (some who DON”T work at the labs). https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2772148

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *